Physics is international but piloting sure aint. Despite efforts to standardise and
internationalise things there are country specific differences for all kinds of
things.
Superficially I have exposure to aviation in 3* nations. Canada
where I’m learning, The US because I’m close to the border and the inevitable
exposure and finally the UK because my interest in planes and stuff was piqued
while I lived there and I tend to gravitate towards expats and my home country on
the internet.
Some of the differences are subtle, The US flys a traffic pattern
not a circuit. Brits turn finals with an s. There’s a fair bit of
radio chatter differences as well but fundamentally if you took any pilot from
one locale and dumped them in another, they’d cope.
Airspace; however, is a different matter. All 3 lands have
different categories of airspace with different restrictions and so on. So much
so in fact that I’ve deliberately avoided learning anything to do with US
airspace because I have a hard enough time keeping the Canadian stuff straight
in my head.
Despite my best efforts though, I’ve inevitably been exposed to the
incomprehensible (to me) system that seems to have evolved back in the UK. It
honestly makes my brain hurt. I try and dig my way through references to radar
services, basic and traffic. Restricted zones, airfields that require prior
permission and god forbid you forget to ask, steep landing fees, airports that
shut as soon as the daylight fades, transit areas and other concepts that I’m
sure I’ve failed to understand.
My impression of the whole situation is twofold; firstly it’s the
kind of bureaucratic mess that only the Brits could create and secondly it makes me a little sad. I have whole swathes of sky here that I can pretty much
do what the hell I like in. Uncontrolled, I don’t need to speak to anyone, hell
I don’t even need a radio!
I know the sheer scale of the country means that things are going
to be different but I can’t help but feel that something fundamental about the
freedom of flying is missing from the experience.
So for a fair few weeks I sat here smug about how easy we have it, how superior the Canadian system was and how unnecessarily complicated
the Brits had made it.
And then I read a post on an internet forum.
Someone trying to explain how a mandatory frequency airfield works
to someone who wasn’t familiar with the concept.
It wasn’t until I saw it written down that I realised how totally
and utterly ludicrous a system it is. I’m not sure whether I should attempt to
explain it myself or just direct you to the post…
Ah what the hell …. Look here , the post #5 with the Tue Sep 30,
2014 3:31 pm time stamp.
For those of you who really don’t get the joke, Timmins is over
500km away.
Yep you go to an airport and instead of doing the usual like you
would at a Unicom airport, looking at each other and keeping out of each other’s
way, you relay all your info through a person who is several hours flight away.
It made no sense to me at the time when I was learning about it for
my Cross Country. It still makes no sense to me.
I guess it’s just what you are used to.
*Ooops, missed #4, Flyinkiwi's doing his best to school me in the ways of the southern folk :)
*Ooops, missed #4, Flyinkiwi's doing his best to school me in the ways of the southern folk :)
No comments:
Post a Comment